← Back to Blog
Teaching Methods6 min read

Teaching English Language Learners in the Mainstream Classroom

Most teachers who have English language learners in their classrooms didn't train specifically to teach them. ELL endorsements and ESL certification programs exist, but the reality is that the majority of students acquiring English are sitting in mainstream classrooms with teachers who may have had one methods course on the subject, if that.

This doesn't mean you can't serve these students well. It means you need a practical toolkit that works within your existing classroom without requiring a complete redesign. Here's what the research supports and what experienced teachers have found actually helps.

Understand Where Your Students Are

English language acquisition isn't binary — students aren't either "English speakers" or "not." WIDA and other frameworks describe a progression of language proficiency levels, typically from entering (very little English) through bridging (near-native academic proficiency). The strategies that work for a Level 1 student look very different from what works for a Level 4.

Get the proficiency level data on your ELL students from your ESL specialist or district records. This isn't optional background information — it determines what scaffolds are appropriate. A student who has conversational English but is still developing academic language needs different support than a student who arrived last month with zero English.

Also find out which language(s) your students speak at home. This matters because bilingual learners transfer skills across languages — a student who is a strong reader in Spanish is in a very different position than a student with limited literacy in any language. Don't assume low English proficiency means low overall ability.

Comprehensible Input: The Core Principle

Stephen Krashen's input hypothesis remains influential for a reason: language acquisition happens when learners can understand messages that are slightly above their current level. Your job as a content teacher is to make your instruction comprehensible — not by dumbing it down, but by adding supports that make meaning accessible.

Practical comprehensible input strategies:

Slow down and chunk. Speak at a natural but deliberate pace. Break complex directions into numbered steps. Pause after important ideas.

Use visuals aggressively. Images, diagrams, graphic organizers, and anchor charts do what words alone can't. If you're teaching photosynthesis, draw it. If you're teaching a math procedure, diagram every step.

Build and activate background knowledge. Before reading or new content, briefly activate what students already know — even in their home language if needed. Prior knowledge is the scaffolding new content hangs on.

Contextualize vocabulary. Teach key content vocabulary explicitly before using it in instruction. ELL students can get lost when an unfamiliar word appears in the middle of an unfamiliar topic. Pre-teaching five to ten critical words pays dividends for the whole lesson.

Scaffolding for Language, Not Ability

The most important mindset shift: scaffolding for ELL students is scaffolding for language access, not for cognitive simplicity. A student who doesn't understand the question "Compare and contrast the causes of World War I and World War II" may understand it perfectly well if given a graphic organizer that shows what "compare and contrast" means and provides sentence frames like "Both _____ and _____ caused..." and "One difference is that _____, while _____..."

Put this method into practice today

Build a lesson plan using the teaching methods you just learned about. Standards-aligned, complete in 60 seconds.

Try the Lesson Plan Generator

The thinking required is identical. The language support makes the task accessible.

Sentence frames and sentence starters are among the most efficient scaffolds available. Post them on the wall, include them on handouts, and make their use normal and non-stigmatizing. When everyone has the frame, no one is singled out for needing it.

LessonDraft helps you generate differentiated materials quickly — you can create modified versions of assignments and scaffolded supports without spending hours on each one.

Build Language Through Content

Content teachers often feel like language development is the ESL teacher's job. It's actually shared responsibility — every classroom is a language classroom for ELL students. This doesn't mean you become a grammar instructor. It means you're intentional about which language functions students need to practice in your content area.

Science students need to describe, explain, and hypothesize. History students need to analyze, argue, and make evidence-based claims. Math students need to explain their reasoning and justify procedures. These are language functions specific to your discipline.

Academic discussion is one of the most underused tools for ELL students. Partner talk and small group discussion give students low-stakes opportunities to practice academic language before producing it in writing or on assessments. Structured protocols — think-pair-share, numbered heads together — ensure ELL students aren't left out of the discussion while others dominate.

Don't Conflate Language and Intelligence

The most corrosive mistake teachers make with ELL students is treating limited English as limited intelligence. A student who can't explain in English why the Civil War happened isn't necessarily a student who doesn't understand why it happened. The assessment task may be measuring language rather than content knowledge.

Where possible, allow multiple modes of demonstrating understanding: drawings, diagrams, oral explanation (in English or L1 if a bilingual teacher or peer is available), or writing in a home language with translation. These aren't accommodations that undermine rigor — they're ways of separating language proficiency from content knowledge.

This also applies to behavior expectations. A student who seems disengaged may be overwhelmed. A student who doesn't answer questions may not be refusing — they may not have parsed the question. Assume confusion before assuming defiance, and investigate.

Build Relationships with Families

ELL students' families often have concerns, resources, and knowledge you need. They may not communicate them if they feel unwelcome, uncertain about school norms, or unsure you want to hear from them.

Get translation support for communications home. Don't rely on students to translate for their parents — it puts children in an inappropriate role and often results in important information being filtered. Many districts have translation resources available; if yours doesn't, Google Translate for written communications is an imperfect but real option.

If a family comes to a conference or meeting, start by asking about their child's strengths and what they've noticed at home. This signals that the conversation is collaborative, not one-directional.

Your Next Step

Identify one ELL student who you think isn't getting enough from your instruction right now. Pull their proficiency level data, find out their home language, and build one targeted support for this week — a vocabulary pre-teach, a visual support, or a sentence frame for an upcoming assignment. Small and targeted beats ambitious and generic every time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between social and academic language proficiency for ELL students?
Jim Cummins' framework distinguishes between BICS (Basic Interpersonal Communicative Skills) and CALP (Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency). BICS is conversational language — the kind students develop quickly through social interaction, typically within 1-3 years. CALP is the formal, abstract language of academic texts and tasks — it takes 5-7 years or more to develop to grade-level proficiency. This gap explains why students who seem fluent in conversation can still struggle significantly with academic reading and writing. Teachers often assume a student with good conversational English no longer needs support. That assumption is frequently wrong and leads to students being exited from ELL services before they're academically ready.
Should I correct ELL students' grammar errors during class discussion?
It depends on the purpose of the activity. During fluency-focused activities — conversation, brainstorming, discussion — error correction interrupts communication and discourages participation. During form-focused activities — grammar lessons, writing revision, specific language practice — explicit correction is appropriate. A middle path is recasting: when a student makes an error, respond to the content of what they said while modeling the correct form. Student: 'She go to store.' Teacher: 'She went to the store — interesting, what did she buy?' The student gets the correction without being put on the spot, and the conversation continues.
How do I assess ELL students fairly when my assessments are language-heavy?
First, distinguish between what you're assessing: are you measuring content knowledge or language proficiency? If you're assessing content, reduce the language load where possible — simplified vocabulary, shorter texts, visual supports, oral responses. If language is genuinely part of what you're assessing (which it is in ELA), grade against appropriate-level expectations rather than grade-level norms. Many districts have ELL accommodations built into their assessment policies; find out what's officially permitted and use it. Portfolios and performance tasks give ELL students more ways to demonstrate competency than single high-stakes tests, and they're worth building into your grading system if possible.

Get weekly lesson planning tips + 3 free tools

Get actionable lesson planning tips every Tuesday. Unsubscribe anytime.

No spam. We respect your inbox.

Put this method into practice today

Build a lesson plan using the teaching methods you just learned about. Standards-aligned, complete in 60 seconds.

No signup needed to try. Free account unlocks 15 generations/month.