← Back to Blog
Teaching Strategies7 min read

Teaching Students How to Study: Evidence-Based Strategies That Actually Work

Most students study the same way: they re-read their notes, maybe highlight key terms, and review their textbook the night before a test. Most students also believe this preparation is adequate. Most students are wrong — not because they're not trying, but because the strategies they're using have been consistently shown to produce poor retention.

Teaching students how to study is a content-area responsibility, not a counselor's job. When your students fail assessments because they don't know how to study, they're not learning your subject matter effectively regardless of how well you teach it.

What the Research Says About Study Strategies

Cognitive science has produced a fairly clear picture of which study strategies work and which ones feel productive while producing little learning.

Re-reading and highlighting are ranked near the bottom by researchers who've examined learning outcomes. They feel productive because they're fluent and comfortable. Fluency is not the same as learning. Re-reading produces a feeling of familiarity with material — students recognize it when they see it — but recognition is not recall, and tests generally require recall.

Retrieval practice (self-testing) is consistently among the most effective strategies. The act of retrieving information from memory — rather than re-exposing yourself to it — strengthens the memory trace and reveals gaps in knowledge. Flashcards, practice tests, writing out everything you know about a topic from memory — these are all retrieval practice. The discomfort of not being able to recall something is not a sign the strategy isn't working; it's the mechanism by which it works.

Spaced practice outperforms massed practice (cramming) significantly for long-term retention. Studying material across multiple sessions separated by time produces more durable learning than equivalent study time concentrated in a single session. Cramming produces short-term retention adequate to pass tomorrow's test but does very little for learning that persists.

Interleaving — mixing different problem types or topics within a study session rather than blocking all practice of one type — improves retention and transfer even though it feels harder and produces lower performance during practice. Students who interleave often feel they're doing worse; their performance on actual assessments is typically better than blocked-practice students.

Elaborative interrogation — asking "why is this true?" about each fact or concept — builds connected understanding rather than isolated memorization. Students who explain the mechanism behind information they're studying retain and transfer it better than students who simply try to memorize it.

How to Teach These Strategies in Your Class

Knowing the research is not enough. Students need explicit instruction, practice, and feedback on study strategy use — the same way they need explicit instruction on content.

Build retrieval practice into daily class routine. A brief low-stakes recall quiz at the start of class — covering material from two days ago rather than yesterday — trains retrieval practice habits while providing spaced practice built into the schedule. Students don't need to know the pedagogical rationale; they just need the regular experience of being asked to retrieve information without their notes.

Assign practice tests instead of re-reading. When you tell students to study for a test, specify what "studying" means: close the notes, write down everything you know about this topic, check your notes, identify your gaps, try again. Students who've been doing retrieval practice consistently perform better on assessments than students who've been told to "review" without specification.

Stop spending Sundays on lesson plans

Join teachers who create complete, standards-aligned lesson plans in under 60 seconds. Free to start — no credit card required.

Try the Lesson Plan Generator

Talk explicitly about why strategies feel harder. Students often abandon effective strategies like retrieval practice because the difficulty signals to them that it's not working. Explaining the desirable difficulties concept — that the same cognitive effort that makes practice feel harder is what makes learning stick — changes how students interpret that discomfort.

Address misconceptions directly. When students say "I've read it three times and I still don't get it," that's a diagnostic opening. Re-reading after the first read is rarely the right strategy. Ask: can you close the book and explain it to me? Can you draw a diagram of how the parts connect? Can you identify which specific sentence is unclear to you? The problem is almost never that they haven't read it enough; it's that they haven't processed it deeply enough.

Spacing Requires Planning

Spaced practice requires teachers to plan for it, not just students. If your unit is structured so that material from week 1 never appears again until the cumulative exam, students can't practice retrieval in a spaced way without significant self-discipline.

Curriculum design that builds in cumulative review — warm-up problems that include material from past units, discussions that reference earlier readings, assessments that mix current and previous content — creates spaced practice opportunities as a feature of the class structure rather than an optional study habit.

LessonDraft helps me plan the cumulative review structures that build spaced practice into my lessons rather than treating study skills as something students manage entirely on their own.

What to Tell Students Directly

Students benefit from explicit discussion of this research. Teaching a 20-minute lesson on effective study strategies — what the research shows, why their default strategies underperform, what to do instead — is time that pays back across every subsequent unit.

The key messages to land:

Difficulty during studying is a sign it's working, not a sign it's too hard. The discomfort of not being able to recall something is the learning mechanism.

Re-reading without retrieval practice is not studying. It's reviewing. Both have their place, but only one of them produces durable learning.

Last-minute cramming is a short-term strategy. It will usually get you through tomorrow's test, but it won't help you in two weeks, in the cumulative exam, or in the next course that builds on this one.

Your Next Step

Add one retrieval practice structure to your next unit — a beginning-of-class recall check, a practice test before the real one, or a homework assignment that asks students to write from memory rather than copy from notes. Run it for three weeks and see how it changes both student preparation habits and their performance on assessments. The research is consistent, but experience in your specific context will show you what implementation adjustments are needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do students keep using re-reading even when it doesn't work?
Re-reading is fluent and comfortable. When you re-read material you've already seen, you process it quickly, it all sounds familiar, and that familiarity feels like understanding. This is the fluency illusion: students confuse the ease of processing with the depth of learning. Retrieval practice, by contrast, feels difficult and generates errors — signals that feel like the strategy isn't working, but are actually the mechanism by which learning occurs. Students need explicit instruction on why the comfortable strategy underperforms before most of them will replace it with the harder one.
How do you fit study skills instruction into an already-full curriculum?
You don't need a separate study skills unit. Embed the instruction in content: explain why you're giving a retrieval quiz rather than a review worksheet, have students compare their recall performance to their re-reading performance in a brief experiment, include one question on a test that asks students to evaluate which study approach would be most effective for a specific task and why. Study skills instruction that's embedded in content costs less time and generalizes better than skills taught in isolation.
Does interleaving work for all subjects?
Interleaving is most clearly supported for mathematics and any subject with varied problem types: different equation forms, different argument structures, different historical periods requiring different analytical frameworks. For subjects with sequential content where later material builds directly on earlier — foreign language grammar, early mathematics — some blocking by type before interleaving is appropriate. The general principle holds across subjects: once students have basic competence with each type, mixing them during practice produces better retention and transfer than continuing to practice each type in isolation.

Get weekly lesson planning tips + 3 free tools

Get actionable lesson planning tips every Tuesday. Unsubscribe anytime.

No spam. We respect your inbox.

Stop spending Sundays on lesson plans

Join teachers who create complete, standards-aligned lesson plans in under 60 seconds. Free to start — no credit card required.

No signup needed to try. Free account unlocks 15 generations/month.